Behind the Conversation: Moving (Back) From a Branded House to a House of Brands

Know When the Chapter Is Over

Mallory asked Seth Odell how he decides when to leave.

He said he thinks about whether he can still describe the job in two sentences, and whether those sentences would change if he stayed. If the answer is no, the chapter is finished. You write the next one.

I've been turning that over for a week.

It explains choices that make no sense from the outside. Who leaves UCLA for Southern New Hampshire University. Who leaves Los Angeles for Manchester. From a distance those look like missteps. Up close they're a person reading the end of a chapter correctly and refusing to pretend otherwise.

What struck me is that none of it was aimed at a title. He wasn't collecting rungs. He was rounding out what he knew, and then he'd move once the learning stopped.

I've met a lot of entrepreneurs with vision. Most of them hand the execution to somebody else. Seth concepted the campaigns, wrote them, art directed them, sat through the edits, got on the bus and crossed the country. The rare thing isn't the idea. It's the willingness to still be in the weeds at two in the morning when the idea stops being fun.

That costs something, and he told us what.

He thinks the business took 10 years off his life. He didn't soften it. He also didn't leave it there, which I keep coming back to, because the easier move would have been to make it a war story. Instead he talked about what he's doing to get those years back.

Then, the topic of the impact of AI-driven search on branding …

Seth believes in the branded house. He said so outright, called himself a staunch supporter, and I agree with him. I've spent a career helping institutions build that case. One university, one story, stronger together than apart.

He thinks AI search may be dismantling it. Not because the strategy was wrong, but because nobody ever buys twice from the same brand, and the questions students ask an LLM are about psychology or nursing or law, not about the institution. The program has to be the authority. The umbrella doesn't help it.

He hasn't resolved whether that's an exception for search strategy or the whole thing giving way.

I don't think he's wrong. I think a lot of deans are about to feel vindicated. And I think there's a version of this where institutions hand their equity to their four strongest programs and figure out too late what they gave up.

I don't have the answer either.

But I wonder if a chapter is ending.

Listen on Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/higher-ed-icons/id1889996806?i=1000793383020

Listen on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/episode/1aUmvqqKbfOKECJfoI7OcA?si=2d98a8506c144466

Watch on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqyOQszI0x4

Next
Next

“Nothing Ever Changes”